Volume-outcome relationships for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era.

نویسندگان

  • Edward L Hannan
  • Chuntao Wu
  • Gary Walford
  • Spencer B King
  • David R Holmes
  • John A Ambrose
  • Samin Sharma
  • Stanley Katz
  • Luther T Clark
  • Robert H Jones
چکیده

BACKGROUND Most studies that are the basis of recommended volume thresholds for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) predate the routine use of stent placement. METHODS AND RESULTS Data from New York's Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Reporting System in 1998 to 2000 (n=107 713) were used to examine the impact of annual hospital volume and annual operator volume on in-hospital mortality, same-day coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and same-stay CABG surgery after adjustment for differences in patients' severity of illness. For a hospital-volume threshold of 400, the odds ratios for low-volume hospitals versus high-volume hospitals were 1.98 (95% CI, 1.17, 3.35) for in-hospital mortality, 2.07 (95% CI, 1.36, 3.15) for same-day CABG surgery, and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.03, 2.21) for same-stay CABG surgery. For an operator-volume threshold of 75, the odds ratios for low-volume versus high-volume operators were 1.65 (95% CI, 1.05, 2.60) for same-day CABG surgery and 1.55 (95% CI, 1.10, 2.18) for same-stay CABG surgery. Operator volume was not significantly associated with mortality. Also, for hospital volumes below 400 and operator volumes below 75, the respective odds of mortality, same-day CABG surgery, and same-stay CABG surgery were 5.92, 4.02, and 3.92 times the odds for hospital volumes of 400 or higher and operator volumes of 75 or higher. CONCLUSIONS Higher-volume operators and hospitals continue to experience lower risk-adjusted PCI outcome rates.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent.

CONTEXT Studies have found an association between physician and institution procedure volume for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) and patient outcomes, but whether implementation of coronary stents has allowed low-volume physicians and centers to achieve outcomes similar to their high-volume counterparts is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship between physician and hospital...

متن کامل

Overview of Intracoronary Brachytherapy for in-Stent Restenosis of a Drug-Eluting Stent

Percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting is considered recently as the most common procedure for the treatment of symptomatic coronary. The article reviewed 41 studies published during 1997-2019 on intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis of a drug-eluting stent. Intracoronary radiation therapy was finally confirmed in the setting of in-stent restenosis using as adjunctive th...

متن کامل

Outcomes following coronary stenting in the era of bare-metal vs the era of drug-eluting stents.

CONTEXT Although drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis rates relative to bare-metal stents, concerns have been raised that drug-eluting stents may also be associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis. Our study focused on the effect of stent type on population-based interventional outcomes. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent nonemergent coronary ste...

متن کامل

[Drug-eluting stents and other anti-restenosis devices].

Restenosis remains as the main limitation of percutaneous coronary intervention, even in the era of coronary stents. Recently, drug-eluting stents have been shown to reduce significantly both the rate of in-stent restenosis and the need for subsequent revascularization procedures compared with bare-metal stents. At present, these beneficial effects have been demonstrated mainly with Cypher (Cor...

متن کامل

How to optimize left main percutaneous coronary intervention.

Despite unfavorable outcomes in the early era of LMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), interventionalists have continued attempting percutaneous treatment for LMCA stenosis (3). Technical advances in PCI and stent technology, particularly with the widespread availability of drug-eluting stents (DES), have led physicians to re-evaluate the role of PCI as a viable alternative treatment f...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Circulation

دوره 112 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005